Festivals and events in Lichfield have added £9.2million to the local economy, a study has claimed.

Lichfield District Council commissioned researchers from Bournemouth University to assess the impact of special events in the city.

A number of music, food and retail festivals take place throughout the year.

But as demand rises, the local authority called in analysts to help understand the impact and the value in continuing to support such events.

A report to a meeting of Lichfield District Council’s economic growth, environment and development overview and scrutiny committee next week said the financial benefits were clear to see.

“In 2018/19, there were just less than 350,000 visits to the key events held within Lichfield, with a total on‐site and off‐site spend of £9.2million.

“Of this, £3.7million was spent at the events themselves, £2.6million was spent within Lichfield, and £2.9million was spent on the trip as a whole outside of Lichfield.

“This study indicates that visitors spend just less than £2million on food and drink at the key events within Lichfield, and spend £1.2million on purchasing goods from stalls to take away from the event.

“Visitors spend just over £300,000 on tickets at the key events held within Lichfield, and more than £250,000 on additional entertainment and leisure activities at the events.

“More than £400,000 was spent within Lichfield on accommodation, while £227,000 was spent on travel and transport (including parking) within Lichfield.”

Report from Bournemouth University researchers

“Views on the impact of key events on businesses were mixed”

The report added that key events across the year supported the equivalent of 113 full time jobs.

A festival in Lichfield

It admitted however that some local businesses did not see a direct financial benefit from local festivals, with just over one in six companies saying they were directly involved with any of the festivals.

“While more than one in ten (15%) businesses feel that they experience increased sales or revenue on days that key events are held, more than half of the businesses feel that they experience decreased sales or revenue (51%).

“Businesses were asked whether they change the operation of their business on key event days to determine the impact they have on local trade.

“Overall, views on the impact of key events on businesses were mixed.

“Just less than half of the businesses agree that some customers are deterred from the general area that key events are held (48%), and 45% agree that they have a negative impact on their business by drawing people away from their business to the event.

“In addition, 11% of businesses agree that the key events help raise the profile of their business.

“However, roughly one‐fifth of businesses agree that the key events offer them access to people who they would not otherwise be able to reach (22%), key events are important for their business success (19%), and that their passing trade increases on days that key events are held (18%).

“It is therefore important to consider the impact that the key events have on local businesses and their trade.”

Report from Bournemouth University researchers

“More than 340,000 people attended festivals and events”

The study said more than 340,000 people had attended festivals and events such as the Lichfield Bower during the year.

The Lichfield Bower

Of those 32% were from Lichfield with 8% from Burntwood, while less than 1% were from overseas.

Age analysis also showed that the events in the city were attracting a greater proportion of people in the 45-64 age bracket, with 67% of all visitors travelling in by car.

“Visitors were asked to indicate what role the event played in their decision to visit Lichfield on the day of the event.

“Of locals, 34% indicated that it was their sole reason for visiting, with a further 29% stating that it was their main reason, and 27% indicating that they were coming in to Lichfield anyway so thought they would visit the event.

“In contrast, only 16% of non‐locals indicated that it was their sole reason for visiting Lichfield, and 32% stated that they had never heard of the event before their visit.

“When looking at the individual events, visitors to the Food Festival, the Lichfield Greenhill Bower and the Rotary Cars in the Park/Lichfield Gin, Cheese & Ale Festival were significantly more likely to state that the event was their sole or main reason for visiting in comparison to visitors to the Home and Garden Festival.

“Visitors to the Home and Garden Festival were significantly more likely to indicate that they were coming into Lichfield anyway so thought they would visit the event or that they had never heard of the event before their visit compared to visitors to all other events.”

Report from Bournemouth University researchers

“A source of community spirit and pride”

The report said that while the current line-up of festivals were clearly a boost to the city’s economy, different types of events should be considered in future.

Fuse Festival. Pic: Robert Yardley Photography

“Key events attract more than 340,000 event visitors throughout the year, and generate more than £9million in visitor spend, with more than £5million of this attributed to visits to Lichfield that would not have occurred if the events were not held.

“As well as the economic benefit, there are a number of community benefits created by the key events within Lichfield.

“The events are a source of community spirit and pride for local residents, and help to create a positive image of Lichfield and one that is inclusive for all.

“There are also a number of recommendations in terms of the type of events that should be supported within the city.

“It is also important that key events reflect what they are marketed as, with stalls, activities and products reflecting the theme of the event.

“More events could be encouraged throughout the year to account for seasonal peaks and troughs.

“A more varied event programme, celebrating the history and heritage of Lichfield may also attract a wider audience.”

Report from Bournemouth University researchers

The report will be discussed at the meeting on 21st January.

Founder of LichfieldLive and editor of the site.

Join the Conversation


  1. In another report by LDC, Cllr Eadie is recommending that weekend parking rates are the same as weekday ones and the increase will generate £176k in additional revenue. Let me think, when do these festivals take place? Oh yes, at the weekend. Isn’t LDC doing its best to put off visitors to the City and Festivals by having higher parking charges? Couldn’t the Council be more imaginative and encourage the festivals and local businesses by reducing parking fees and inviting more visitors? Seems we are back to the bad old days of this council and fleecing everyone in the area. Shame on Pullen, Eadie and LDC; do something positive for a change and improve the city instead of extracting as much as possible from residents and visitors.

  2. I assume it’s vaguely (very vaguely) based on increased custom in shops, restaurants, bars and hotels etc. Throw in a few guesses about car parking charges and voila! £9.2m is “the figure”.

  3. I absolutely believe these figures – and the millions a similar report says that the Lichfield Garrick Theatre brings to the City.

    This is why every town in Britain should do the same starting with #Burntwood getting its Arts Base promused by the Conservatives. It’s clearly a no brainer and can’t think why this has not happened already.

  4. Always Lichfield never Burntwood! Waiting to see the blue hoardings at the back of Morrison’s decorated to promote Burntwood. The Council certainly know how to waste money on Friarsgate!

  5. Both reports on car parking fees and the festivals report contradict each other. One claims increase in footfall and millions spent. The car parking report reversed this as the figures on car parking usage have declined significantly.

    I don’t believe the increase is from West Midlands trains as they cannot provide a regular basic service.

    I believe the car parking report as this is based on coinage and exact figures from the machines.

    The Bournemouth report I do not believe. It’s clearly been written with an agenda by the administration. I suspect officers not councillors have felt insecure by the success of the festivals hence the report to get back control

    Interestingly the two main directors of LDC have now disappeared probably on pay offs to get rid of them and drain the swamp.

    There is a true story behind all of this and o am sure we will never actually see it

  6. It seems like festivals is about the best choice for Lichfield as the shopping is terrible, and it’s only going to get worse – as larger nearby towns expand their parks, why would a mainstream retailer open in Lichfield?

    It may not be £9.2m, but if the increased footfall helps businesses and they can be put on without draining the public finances, which seem stretched as it is, then it’s surely good news?

  7. There is a distinct difference between the so called ‘festival’s business and shop business. If the statistics above are read properly this clearly reflects that. None of the shops in Market Street, Bore Street, Bird Street and Bakers Lane want their shop fronts screened by outside traders stalls. In the statistics very few benefit and those that do are probably the likes of Mc. Donalds and the coffee shops.
    Shop rates in Lichfield are high, it is self evident that retail on the high street is scarcely viable. Of the reported £9.2 million hardly any of it will have remained in the city. It will have dissipated amongst the travelling trade stalls that are rapidly appearing at every opportunity. There is, of course, money to be made for the council out of this new business. Notwithstanding the business rates shops are charged, the stall holders have to pay rent space so there is a double whammy for the council. Yet another case of the Lichfield District Council putting monetary gain above the indigenous population of shop holders.
    Traditional celebrations like the Bower, and off street events like Cars in the Park have a place in the culture of the city. Food Fests Do Not! They are unfair to existing traders in tangible and consequential ways; even the fact that their existing customers have great difficulty parking during such events.
    A heratige and cultural city needs a viable, vibrant and varied shopping experience. It should not have to import these sham, overpriced stall traders. Wake up council you are further diminishing the livelihoods of already struggling loyal citizen traders.

  8. Philip Allso, snap! I absolutely totally agree with your analysis. Even wrote a similar piece that I intended to send to Ross. Might yet still do. It included as part of it the issue of the proposed ring road at John Street and related to that environment issues.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *