An investigation into a controversial land deal in Lichfield says “abnormal construction costs” were the reason why a sale below the original valuation was agreed.

The land off Leyfields that had been earmarked for new housing

Lichfield District Council commissioned the report into the issues surrounding the agreement to sell plots at Leyfields and Netherstowe to housing association Bromford.

The planning application to build homes on the land has since been withdrawn following a public backlash, but the investigation has continued.

Among the complaints considered was why a £470,000 sale was agreed when a previous higher valuation was put on the site.

The report, published by Stuart Evans, legal director at Anthony Collins LLP, said the District Valuer had placed an initial price on the sites.

An offer of £470,000 then came in from Bromford factoring in the “abnormal construction costs” totalling £137,000 – although the details of what these were are not included in the report.

“The District Valuer valued Leyfields at £390,000 and Netherstowe at £265,000 both ‘on the basis of affordable rent units being constructed and assuming a subsidy of £40,000 per plot being available to a registered provider of housing but excluding abnormal construction costs’.

“The District Valuer concludes that the lower amount to be acceptable as ‘although the offer figure is below the figure originally put forward, this figure is significantly above both the unsubsidised affordable rent figure and market value housing figure and hence represents a capital sum that is higher than is likely to be expected from many other potential purchasers’.

“The best consideration could be achieved by the disposal to a registered social housing provider due to the grant funds they receive as a special purchaser and therefore would gain a higher amount than on the open market.”

External investigator’s report

In his recommendations, the investigator said the local authority needed to ensure in future that it was continually assessing the price of land it hoped to dispose of.

“To ensure best practice is maintained throughout the project where time has elapsed since the original valuation a further valuation should be obtained.”

External investigator’s report

Although the land sale had been agreed, the withdrawal of the planning application means that a final sale is unlikely to go ahead.

A council spokesperson said last week that both the local authority and Bromford did not “intend to pursue development of the sites” going forward.

The external investigator’s report will be discussed at a meeting of the council’s audit and member standards committee on 27th April.

7 replies on “Investigation says “abnormal construction costs” were behind price of controversial land deal”

  1. The children of Lichfield need more space to play, not less. It also needs to be near where they live. Children shouldn’t have to walk miles to the park to find somewhere to play and let off steam. Protect our limited recreation areas.

  2. It just gets better doesn’t it? Not only was the land sold without the knowledge of the cabinet or leader and without public consultation, it now transpires that it was sold below the valuation price.

  3. How much of our money has this council lost in the last 5 years, as a direct result of mismanagement and incompetence?? But nothing changes tho. They get voted in. We live (or used to) in a wonderful, quaint city. Look around today….traffic jams, road works, new housing estates which literally nobody wants, no local infrastructure (doctors, schools, leisure facilities).

    They are sucking the very life out of the city, determined to make us an overspill of Birmingham (this is their stated desire, as per their development plan – look it up if you don’t believe me).

    My parents, from North London, decided about 12 months ago that they were selling up and moving to Lichfield – to be closer to family and grandchildren etc. Because of lockdown – last weekend was the first time they’d visited Lichfield in approx 15 months.

    Guess what? They’ve decided not to move to Lichfield. It’s “too built up”.

    Well done Lichfield District Council.

    I for one am currently looking to move now too. It’s such a massive shame that a few misguided and inept councillors (Mr Eadie being one of the main culprits), are being allowed to run riot with OUR CITY.

    We need wholesale change.

  4. So the cabinet and the CEO did know about this sale, and the cabinet, chaired by Mike Wilcox, approved it? Have we been lied to about this? Did the much lauded investigation include this little gem? Time for some more digging Lichfield Live.

  5. Mike Wilcox is now off to the relatively safe seat of Burntwood South; fortunately as he lives in Alrewas (about as far as you can get from Burntwood, but admittedly not in Cumbria) so at least he’ll be seen as much as Fabbo (close to zero), and hopefully won’t cost us £15 million.

Comments are closed.