Don’t miss out!

Get all the most important news and events to your inbox.

It would be too costly to build a new leisure centre on the site of the failed Friarsgate development in Lichfield city centre, councillors have been told.

The land – now renamed as the Birmingham Road Site – was one of eight locations considered for the long-term replacement for Friary Grange Leisure Centre.

Part of the site earmarked for the failed Friarsgate scheme on Birmingham Road

But with Stychbrook Park now identified as the preferred location for the new facility, an overview and scrutiny committee meeting was told the city centre option would have proven too costly.

Cllr Liz Little, cabinet member for major projects and economic development, said:

“Birmingham Road Site was identified as a possible site, but following the analysis it was not favourable for a number of reasons.

“It is situated in a conservation area which would inherently increase the build costs.

“Parking would also be an issue in a city centre location, and the site has already been identified for other purposes in the approved city centre masterplan.”

Cllr Liz Little

Liberal Democrat representative for Chadsmead ward, Cllr Paul Ray, has previously called for the former Friarsgate site to be considered as the site of a new leisure centre in Lichfield.

But while he has backed the current proposal, he said he hoped to see the reserve option kept on the table in case the planned location is found to be unsuitable.

“I’m on the task group for the new leisure centre and it is clear that Stychbrook Park is the preferred option.

“I do fully support his – I’m on the task group and it is the clear preferred option.

Although I support Stychbrook, two other options I thought might be viable options if this didn’t go ahead. First one was I asked about Beacon Park because there are locations that were considered. Other one was BRS which I think should be left as a reserve.

“But the Birmingham Road Site does offer a fantastic central location and the infrastructure is very strong.

“I do appreciate there are some challenges with it, such as build costs, but there is a potential positive in that our city centre is having to be reinvented – we knew that anyway and COVID-19 has brought that even more into the spotlight.

“A leisure centre in the city centre could have be real catalyst in driving footfall.”

Cllr Paul Ray

“”The Birmingham Road Site will be in reserve”

Cllr Little confirmed that the land left derelict by the failed Friarsgate scheme would remain an option.

Cllr Liz Little

But she added that any move to introduce a leisure centre into the plans would pose other problems.

“The Birmingham Road Site will be in reserve – but there are concerns over that site.

“Putting a leisure centre in a city has been known to rejuvenate centres, but it would take up almost the entire footprint of the site.

“The houses we were designating for that site would also be in very, very close proximity to what would be a very, very large leisure centre.”

Cllr Liz Little

A decision on the preferred location for the new leisure centre will be made by the council’s cabinet in October.

Protect our independence - donate now

Our non-for-profit, independent community journalism is produced by volunteers and survives thanks to your regular contributions.

£
£
£

Your contribution is appreciated.

Ross

Founder of Lichfield Live and editor of the site.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. I fail to see the logic in placing a leisure centre that wont be much bigger then the Friary leisure centre already in place. Ripping up open space that has only recently had a childs play our, funded by this council placed there. This field also has a small bit of woodland that should be protected. Its also been the hosting of kids football training etc for many years. I can only assume that the council live in a different reality.

  2. Build costs? Will this apply to other things put on this site (assuming that some sort of decision is reached and followed through)? As for being in a conservation area, does this include conserving what looks like a bomb site at the moment? According to this we can forget about any affordable housing there.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *